Essentially four changes in the law would be needed to prevent AEs from existing or control AEs if they existed. - First, the law would have to authorize the direct regulation of artificial general intelligence (AGI), by mandating programming features and verifying their installation. Some consensus exists in the AGI industry that malevolent algorithms pose a threat to humans. But legal experts are just beginning to comment on the issue of how to approach such regulation. - Second, algorithmic control of entities would have to be prohibited. The change is necessary to prevent algorithms - as opposed to humans using algorithms - from engaging in criminal activity for which no human can be held responsible and from resisting regulation by asserting the legal rights of entities they control. - Third, as discussed in the previous section, to render AEs identifiable by law enforcement, the law would have to require that all entities reveal their beneficial owners. - Fourth, for the international movement of money to be traced effectively, international cooperation would have to be automated and capable of tracing in real time. That will require the modification of treaties.